<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advanced System Care from IOBit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freepcsecurity.co.uk/2009/07/05/advanced-system-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freepcsecurity.co.uk/2009/07/05/advanced-system-care/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: cotojo</title>
		<link>http://freepcsecurity.co.uk/2009/07/05/advanced-system-care/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>cotojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freepcsecurity.co.uk/?p=2335#comment-278</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BigJoeRice&lt;/strong&gt; - At the original time of writing it appeared to be a very good program. Events late last year proved that their methods were less than honest and the program was put together using definitions and intellectual property belonging to other vendors without the vendors knowledge or permission. 
	The original article was written in July 2009 and a disclaimer was added in November 2009 when events started to unfold. 
	What they had done was to take several programs from other vendors and repackage it as their own work, which it was not. 
	It is not a program I use as there are better alternatives that are free and made available by reputable companies.	 
Regards 
	Colin </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BigJoeRice</strong> - At the original time of writing it appeared to be a very good program. Events late last year proved that their methods were less than honest and the program was put together using definitions and intellectual property belonging to other vendors without the vendors knowledge or permission.<br />
	The original article was written in July 2009 and a disclaimer was added in November 2009 when events started to unfold.<br />
	What they had done was to take several programs from other vendors and repackage it as their own work, which it was not.<br />
	It is not a program I use as there are better alternatives that are free and made available by reputable companies.<br />
Regards<br />
	Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigJoeRice</title>
		<link>http://freepcsecurity.co.uk/2009/07/05/advanced-system-care/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>BigJoeRice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freepcsecurity.co.uk/?p=2335#comment-277</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused. In the first paragraph you say that you can no longer support or advocate 10Bit programs like ASC. 
 
The you spend the next seventeen paragraphs extoling its virtues.  
 
So is it crap or not? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m confused. In the first paragraph you say that you can no longer support or advocate 10Bit programs like ASC.</p>
<p>The you spend the next seventeen paragraphs extoling its virtues. </p>
<p>So is it crap or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

